Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 10: 1022605, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20236552

ABSTRACT

Favipiravir and remdesivir are drugs to treat COVID-19. This study aims to find an optimum and validated method for simultaneous analysis of favipiravir and remdesivir in Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling (VAMS) by Ultra High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrophotometry. The use of VAMS can be an advantage because the volume of blood is small and the sample preparation process is simple. Sample preparation was done by precipitation of protein using 500 µL of methanol. Analysis was carried out by ultra high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrophotometry with ESI+ and MRM with m/z 157.9 > 112.92 for favipiravir, 603.09 > 200.005 for remdesivir, and at m/z 225.968 > 151.991 for acyclovir as the internal standard. The separation was carried out using an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column (100 × 2.1 mm; 1.7 m), 0.2% formic acid-acetonitrile (50:50), flow rate was 0.15 mL/min, and column temperature was 50°C. The analytical method has been validated with the requirements issued by the Food and Drug Administration (2018) and European Medicine Agency (2011). The calibration range of favipiravir is 0.5-160 µg/mL and 0.002-8 µg/mL for remdesivir.

2.
Bioanalysis ; 13(24): 1851-1863, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1380034

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 led to changes in the way blood samples are collected. As societies were isolated to control viral spread, access to facilities became limited. Remote sample collection with a volumetric microsampling approach, using Mitra® devices based on VAMS® technology, proved to be highly effective. It allowed people to collect high-quality samples at home and post them to a laboratory. This enabled scientists to conduct large serosurveillance studies, with results showing that seroprevalence of COVID-19 was higher than initially expected. Furthermore, remote microsampling studies by several institutions were conducted to measure the relationship between antigen levels and antibody response and duration. VAMS technology was also used in COVID-19 clinical trials. In summary, the independent research reviewed in this paper proved that VAMS is an effective sample collection alternative.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Blood Specimen Collection/methods , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , Dried Blood Spot Testing/methods , Humans , Population Surveillance , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Specimen Handling/methods
3.
Front Immunol ; 12: 696370, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1357528

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic is caused by SARS-CoV-2, a novel zoonotic coronavirus. Emerging evidence indicates that preexisting humoral immunity against other seasonal human coronaviruses (HCoVs) plays a critical role in the specific antibody response to SARS-CoV-2. However, current work to assess the effects of preexisting and cross-reactive anti-HCoVs antibodies has been limited. To address this issue, we have adapted our previously reported multiplex assay to simultaneously and quantitatively measure anti-HCoV antibodies. The full mPlex-CoV panel covers the spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N) proteins of three highly pathogenic HCoVs (SARS-CoV-1, SARS-CoV-2, MERS) and four human seasonal strains (OC43, HKU1, NL63, 229E). Combining this assay with volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS), we measured the anti-HCoV IgG, IgA, and IgM antibodies in fingerstick blood samples. The results demonstrate that the mPlex-CoV assay has high specificity and sensitivity. It can detect strain-specific anti-HCoV antibodies down to 0.1 ng/ml with 4 log assay range and with low intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation (%CV). We also estimate multiple strain HCoVs IgG, IgA and IgM concentration in VAMS samples in three categories of subjects: pre-COVID-19 (n=21), post-COVID-19 convalescents (n=19), and COVID-19 vaccine recipients (n=14). Using metric multidimensional scaling (MDS) analysis, HCoVs IgG concentrations in fingerstick blood samples were well separated between the pre-COVID-19, post-COVID-19 convalescents, and COVID-19 vaccine recipients. In addition, we demonstrate how multi-dimensional scaling analysis can be used to visualize IgG mediated antibody immunity against multiple human coronaviruses. We conclude that the combination of VAMS and the mPlex-Cov assay is well suited to performing remote study sample collection under pandemic conditions to monitor HCoVs antibody responses in population studies.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Coronavirus/immunology , Cross Reactions/immunology , Immunoassay/methods , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Betacoronavirus/immunology , COVID-19/immunology , Coronavirus 229E, Human/immunology , Coronavirus NL63, Human/immunology , Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Proteins/immunology , Coronavirus OC43, Human/immunology , Humans , Immunoglobulin A/blood , Immunoglobulin A/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Immunoglobulin M/immunology , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology
4.
Drug Test Anal ; 13(7): 1238-1248, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1258052

ABSTRACT

The outbreak of the new coronavirus disease changed the world upside down. Every day, millions of people were subjected to diagnostic testing for Covid-19, all over the world. Molecular tests helped in the diagnosis of current infection by detecting the presence of viral genome whereas serological tests helped in detecting the presence of antibody in blood as well as contributed to vaccine development. This testing helped in understanding the immunogenicity, community prevalence, geographical spread and conditions post-infection. However, with the contagious nature of the virus, biological specimen sampling involved the risk of transmission and spread of infection. Clinic or pathology visit was the most concerning part. Trained personnel and resources was another barrier. In this scenario, microsampling played an important role due to its most important advantage of remote, contactless, small volume and self-sampling. Minimum requirements for sample storage and ease of shipment added value in this situation. The highly sensitive instruments and validated assay formats assured the accuracy of results and stability of samples. Microsampling techniques are contributing effectively to the Covid-19 pandemic by reducing the demand for clinical staff in population-level testing. The validated and established applications supported the use of microsampling in diagnosis, therapeutic drug monitoring, development of treatment or vaccines and clinical trials for Covid-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing , COVID-19/diagnosis , Specimen Handling , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use , Clinical Trials as Topic , Drug Monitoring , Humans , Population Surveillance , Predictive Value of Tests , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
5.
Bioanalysis ; 13(8): 621-629, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1173023

ABSTRACT

Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) is increasingly utilized for both nonclinical and clinical pharmacokinetic studies. Currently, VAMS is employed as the sampling method for the detection of antibodies for coronavirus disease 2019. Biotherapeutics whole blood stability on VAMS presents as a critical concern for the health and pharmaceutical industries. In this follow-up to our previous publication, we evaluated daclizumab and trastuzumab whole blood sample stability on VAMS. The drug recovery data we observed at room temperature for short term and -80°C for long term was very encouraging. The knowledge could help us better understand and plan important investigation timelines, especially pandemic situations where human whole blood samples from a large population are collected and in urgent need of data analysis.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/blood , Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacokinetics , Dried Blood Spot Testing/methods , Animals , Blood Specimen Collection/methods , Daclizumab/blood , Daclizumab/pharmacokinetics , Drug Storage , Light , Rats , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Temperature , Trastuzumab/blood , Trastuzumab/pharmacokinetics
6.
Drug Des Devel Ther ; 14: 5757-5771, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1016010

ABSTRACT

An infectious disease, COVID-19, caused by a new type of coronavirus, has been discovered recently. This disease can cause respiratory distress, fever, and fatigue. It still has no drug and vaccine for treatment and prevention. Therefore, WHO recommends that people should stay at home to reduce disease transmission. Due to the quarantine, FDA stated that this could hamper drug development clinical trial protocols. Hence, an alternative sampling method that can be applied at home is needed. Currently, volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) has become attention in its use in clinical and bioanalytical fields. This paper discusses the advantages and challenges that might be found in the use of VAMS as an alternative sampling tool in clinical trials and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) during the COVID-19 pandemic. VAMS allows easy sampling, can be done at home, storage and delivery at room temperature, and the volume taken is small and minimally invasive. VAMS is also able to absorb a fixed volume that can increase the accuracy and precision of analytical methods, and reduce the hematocrit effects (HCT). The use of VAMS is expected to be implemented immediately in clinical trials and TDM during this pandemic considering the benefits it has.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Drug Monitoring/methods , SARS-CoV-2 , Specimen Handling/methods , Drug Development , Drug Discovery , Humans
7.
Bioanalysis ; 12(13): 919-935, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-656243

ABSTRACT

Aim: Evaluation of a novel microsampling device for its use in clinical sample collection and biomarker analysis. Methodology: Matching samples were collected from 16 healthy donors (ten females, six males; age 42 ± 20) via K2EDTA touch activated phlebotomy (TAP) device and phlebotomy. The protein profile differences between sampling groups was evaluated using aptamer-based proteomic assay SomaScan and selected ELISA. Conclusion: Somascan signal concordance between phlebotomy- and TAP-generated samples was studied and comparability of protein abundances between these blood sample collection methods was demonstrated. Statistically significant correlation in selected ELISA assays also confirmed the TAP device applicability to the quantitative analysis of protein biomarkers in clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Blood Proteins/analysis , Phlebotomy/instrumentation , Adult , Biomarkers/blood , COVID-19 , Clinical Trials as Topic , Coronavirus Infections/blood , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Hemolysis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/blood , Proteomics/instrumentation , Young Adult
8.
J Pharm Biomed Anal ; 191: 113597, 2020 Nov 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-733741

ABSTRACT

The multiple pathological effects of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, and its total novelty, mean that currently a lot of diagnostic and therapeutic tools, established and tentative alike, are needed to treat patients in a timely, effective way. In order to make these tools more reliable, faster and more feasible, biological fluid microsampling techniques could provide many advantages. In this review, the most important microsampling techniques are considered (dried matrix spots, volumetric absorptive microsampling, microfluidics and capillary microsampling, solid phase microextraction) and their respective advantages and disadvantages laid out. Moreover, currently available microsampling applications of interest for SARS-CoV-2 therapy are described, in order to make them as much widely known as possible, hopefully providing useful information to researchers and clinicians alike.


Subject(s)
Chemistry Techniques, Analytical/trends , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Blood Specimen Collection , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Dried Blood Spot Testing , Humans , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Solid Phase Microextraction , Tandem Mass Spectrometry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL